December 15th, 2017 by

Vi medverkar i Musikhjälpen 2017!


Likt förra året så medverkar vi i Musikhjälpen 2017! Till förmån för utsatta barn så auktionerar vi ut en möjlighet att få ett meddelande inetsat på ett kretskort i vårat instrument, som är tänkt att landa på månens yta! Gå in och buda på Tradera-auktionen genom att klicka på denna länk.

Vi kommer även att medverka i själva programmet Musikhjälpen klockan ett imorgon kväll dvs Fredag kväll dvs Lördag morgon 01:00. Vi kommer att berätta om vårat projekt samt såklart uppmuntra fler att gå in och buda på auktionen 🙂

Vi höres då!

December 12th, 2017 by

Work continues

It has been a hectic autumn with little time for updates, about time for one!

First of all we paid IRF a second visit, for vibration testing. This turned up one problem, an M4 nut coming slightly lose. To rectify this we’ve invested in torque wrenches and are working on an assembly manual with specified torques for every screw and nut. For the curious, the work-in-progress manual is up on our GitHub account here.

The second bit of news is that we have a master’s thesis student working with us, Clayton Forssén. His job at the moment is to write LabView code parsing output from our prototype instrument. The goal is to get a series of measurements done in our vacuum chamber with the new XYZ E-field applicating cube (a miniaturization of the capacitor plate plywood cube we have used in earlier tests).

Clayton working

Current lab. On the left: Clayton working

The third news is that our deadline has been pushed at least another year into the future. This gives us some much-needed time to fine-tune the design, code, documentation and so on.

That’s all for this update. As always, keep watching this space for more interesting stuff 😎

May 30th, 2017 by

Noisy compression follow-up

This is a follow-up on the previous post. The central theme this time is “noise”.

After posting the last post in various places SA2KNG suggested “8bit float” on IRC, to which I immediately replied “µ-law”. µ-law and A-law are companding techniques defined in G.711 and primarily used in telephony. A-law is especially close to a binary floating point representation, including a subnormal range, but with no way to represent +/-infinity or NaN (not-a-number). Only 4 bits for mantissa is a bit restrictive however. A similar idea is to use 16-bit half-precision floats. This would give the same kind of compression ratio as the codec in the previous post, but with much simpler logic. The cost of this is some loss of precision. This isn’t a huge deal however, since our input noise is high enough to mask this effect.

The dominating form of electrical noise in our system is the Johnson-Nyquist noise from the 100 MΩ feedback resistors in our transimpedance amplifiers, which at room temperature contribute 1.3 µV/Hz. Our analog-to-digital converter (ADS131A04) is configured with OSR=512 and gain=16, so the noise seen after the ADS131’s internal amplifier is ((1.3*16*1800)² + 77²) = 886 µVrms (the 77 µVrms figure comes from the datasheet). With Vref=2.442 V this corresponds to an effective number of bits (ENOB) of 10.9. Hence an “seee mmmm mmmm mmmm” type of floating point representation should work well. It also leaves enough dynamic range for measuring very weak signals. The best of both worlds (:

I find it quite good to write these kinds of posts since it allows me to sanity-check my reasoning around things. Noise is an especially tricky subject with lots of traps. In writing this I discovered one error in my notes where I had not accounted for the J-N noise being amplified by the ADS131’s internal PGA. This helped explain the noise levels seen in some measurements.

May 29th, 2017 by

Sample compression experiment

No posts in a while, time for a technical writeup!

I (Tomas) did a small experiment around compressing 24-bit sample data today, in an effort to try to get more throughput out of the 115200 baud RS-485 connection we’ll have in our lunar electrostatic instrument.

Our hardware currently delivers three channels of 24-bit data sampled at around 1800 samples/s. With an overhead equivalent to about one channel’s worth of data this comes to 1800 * 4 * 24 = 172800 bit/s, more than our poor RS-485 bus can handle. The final version of our instrument will have as many as nine channels active simultaneously, which means spending 4-5x more time downloading than actually capturing data!

Since we want to get as much science out of our instrument as possible, I spent some time trying to investigate ways to increase throughput. Simplicity is key since we’re running on a 7.37 MHz 8-bit microcontroller.

The idea for a codec for this is based on two observations:

The combination of these two means that each sample can be “trimmed”, lopping off both most-significant and least-significant bits in a lossless process. An experiment with a 1027 B block of actual instrument data (7 B header + 1020 B data) yielded these results:

Case Size Notes
original 1027
bzip2 -9 1101 worse!
lz4 1011 LZ4_compress_default()
lz4 v2 1018 data transposed prior to compression (least significant bytes first)
gzip -9 945
this codec 762 fuzzed with american fuzzy lop (afl)

With the codec the samples compress to 16 bits each (from 24), which with overhead should result in a throughput increase of 34%. Not super great, but potentially useful. afl was quite useful for discovering bugs in the implementation. The other options performed worse (especially bzip2), and will most definitely not be worth the cycles.

TL;DR: a simple lossless codec can often work much better than a general-purpose compressor :]

RE: the project overall, we’re very busy getting our current prototype ready to send to IRF Kiruna. Hence the lack of updates lately.

See you next time!

February 26th, 2017 by

Visiting the IRF, space instrument construction tips

Last week Tomas and Maria visited IRF, the Swedish Institute of Space Physics, in Kiruna. The reasons were two-fold: first the science part, which is mainly Maria’s area. The second reason was engineering, which is Tomas’ domain and the main focus of this post.

For the science bit, getting feedback from the space science community is important. It allows us to be reasonably confident that we know what problems expect when it comes to measuring. It also helps advertise our work to scientists that may be interested in our data, and gives ideas about possible future missions.

As for engineering, lots and lots of useful tips. In no particular order:

Cabling: wires should be bundled into harnesses. Pin headers + sockets are preferable, since they still allow some springiness but will not have much trouble with vibration. PTFE, Kapton and FEP are good, thermal vacuum compatible insulation materials. PVC is unacceptable. Flat flex is OK, but may crack or disconnect due to vibration.

Connectors: Every connector should be unique, so there is zero risk of incorrect hookup. Keep “protruding” connector elements for power on the instrument side, so that cables used for power have their elements “sunk in”. Typically this means female (sleeve) type of connector, but some pin types are also sunken. Use gold plated connectors.

Solder joins: Rosin core 63/37 SnPb solder has a predictable melting point and cleans well enough with isopropyl alcohol. Use clear Kynar heat shrink tubing where possible, especially on D-subminiature connectors, see picture below. This prevents loose pieces of wire from accidentally shorting pins

Proper soldering of DD-50 connector, with protective Kynar heat shrink tubing

Proper soldering of DD-50 connector, with protective Kynar heat shrink tubing

Cleaning: brush using pure isopropyl alcohol or 70/30 isopropyl alcohol/distilled water. The latter may be needed to remove certain salts. Rinse with pure isopropyl alcohol afterwards. DO NOT use ultrasonic cleaning if using any ceramic parts; they may crack.

Glue/epoxy: Scotch-Weld 2216 is thermal vacuum safe. Mix, then use vacuum to draw out any air trapped inside. After vacuuming, the mix is good for about 15 minutes. Use Scotch-Weld to hold down large ICs, spot glue bodge cables or anything else that might move but shouldn’t. Useful for gluing nuts, since locking nuts are not thermal vacuum safe.

PCB laminates: FR4 outgasses slightly, but is perfectly fine thermal vacuum-wise. High-voltage boards should use ceramic substrates such as Rogers R4003 since the outgassing of FR4 may create a rarefied atmosphere, causing arcing and equipment failure. This is not a problem for us luckily 🙂

Digital logic: short missions near Earth (such as ours) do not need any kind if special ICs. Mechanical structures that withstand vibration testing are thick enough to shield ICs from any problematic radiation. As an example, IRF have sent instruments using off-the-shelf ARM chips without problems.

Latch-up protection: a series resistor followed by a capacitor to ground is enough to protect chips from blowing up in case of latch-up. Power cycle to remove any latch-up situations.

Plastic parts: PEEK works well enough for most plastic parts, and is thermal vacuum safe.

Tape: usually Kapton is fine, but pay attention to the glue used. There are also tapes with specific thermal radiation properties which may be used in lieu of plating or painting.

These tips should be handy both for AMSAT folks and possibly anyone who’s looking into building vacuum equipment. Finally, I’m going to round this post off with some more pictures:

Thermal vacuum (TVAC) chamber

Thermal vacuum (TVAC) chamber

XSAN instrument being prepped for thermal vacuum test

XSAN instrument being prepped for thermal vacuum test

The *big* vacuum chamber

The big vacuum chamber

Thanks for reading! As always, you can be notified of new posts via RSS.

January 11th, 2017 by

Video from ForskarFredag 2016

Don’t forget to follow our Youtube channel!

Next Page » « Previous Page


AddressScube, Fabriksgatan 8b kv., 903 31 Umeå, Sweden Temporarily down (2019-02-28)
E-Mail (Press) Temporarily down